
On August 7, 1782, General George Washington, Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army, created the “Badge of Military Merit,” or Purple Heart, to recognize regular soldiers and non-commissioned officers who demonstrated “not only instances of unusual gallantry in battle, but also extraordinary fidelity and essential service in any way,” during the American Revolution.
By that summer, the war had been waged for more than 7 years, and the Continental Army had experienced thousands of casualties and losses. Existing records of the time show that General Washington personally awarded the Badge of Military Merit – which he designed in “the figure of a heart in purple cloth or silk, edged with narrow lace or binding” – to three non-commissioned officers. It would not be awarded for another 150 years – until the bicentennial of Washington’s birth on February 22, 1932.
On that date, in honor of General Washington’s memory and military achievements, United States (U.S.) Army Chief of Staff, General Douglas MacArthur, announced that World War I Veterans who had been wounded or received a Meritorious Service Citation, were eligible to receive the Badge, renamed “Purple Heart.” General MacArthur, who was instrumental in reviving the nation’s oldest military decoration, oversaw its redesign to the modern Purple Heart known today – a bronze-bordered purple heart-shaped medal bearing Washington’s profile and coat of arms – and received Purple Heart No. 1.
On December 3, 1942, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9277, extending applicability of the Purple Heart to all U.S. Military Services, and designating the award for those were wounded, killed or died as a result of wounds received in action, rather than for meritorious service.
Over the years, Congress and the President have continued to authorize changes to the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart, based on medical conditions, conflicts, and other events. These include expanding eligibility to military personnel and government civilians killed or wounded in international terrorist attacks after March 28, 1973; servicemembers killed or wounded in action by friendly fire; and former prisoners of war who were wounded before April 25, 1962. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 1998 limited the award to only servicemembers of the Armed Forces. Most recently, the NDAA for FY 2015 expanded eligibility to servicemembers killed or wounded in attacks against the U.S. by foreign terrorist organizations.
Since 1932, an estimated 1.8 million Purple Hearts have been awarded to servicemembers in the name of the President of the United States.
At a congressional hearing held February 26, 2019, then VA Secretary Robert L. Wilkie announced a change to the VA claims process, stating, “Those who hold the Purple Heart, the recognition of wounds taken in battle, will now receive priority consideration when it comes to claims before the Department of Veterans Affairs.” The VA Veterans Benefits Administration amended its priority processing categories to include initial disability claims received from Purple Heart recipients on or after April 1, 2019.
Purple Heart history quiz
Sources
- Purple Heart, The Institute of Heraldry, Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army
- Purple Heart Wikipedia
- The Purple Heart – The Story of America’s Oldest Military Decoration and Some Soldier Recipients, Army History
- 8 Things You Need to Know About the Purple Heart Medal, USO
- Military Badges, The Fred W. Smith National Library for the Study of George Washington at Mount Vernon
- Purple Heart recipients added to VA priority claim process, March 1, 2019, VAntage Point
- Secretary Wilkie testifies that VA will accelerate disability benefits claims processing for Purple Heart Medal recipients, February 26, 2019, VA Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs New Release
Share this story
Related Stories
Featured Stories
VA Social Worker Anna B. Raines, Pioneer of the Veterans Foster Care Program
Anna B. Raines was frustrated. As the lone psychiatric social worker between 1924 and 1944 at the Veterans Hospital in Tuskegee, Alabama, Raines operated without a proper office, resources, or staff while serving a population of some 600 patients. Raines was also responsible for Veterans in the 22 counties surrounding Tuskegee. Raines took her profession seriously and was often disheartened by what she perceived as administration’s indifference to her position. Raines’ personal papers convey a tale of struggle and document the numerous limits she faced as an early VA social worker. [1] She nevertheless persevered and developed a prototype of a home-based foster care system for Veterans long before similar programs were implemented nationally.
Featured Stories
Issue in Doubt: Veteran Voting Rights in Post-Civil War National Homes
In the post-Civil War era, ensuring that former members of our Nation’s military had the opportunity to vote was not always a straightforward task. During the Civil War, many states had loosened voting restrictions and allowed soldiers to vote while away fighting. Commanders allowed sufficient time during marches for their troops to cast a ballot, which many mailed home in cracker or cigar boxes.[1] Yet when the Civil War ended and Veterans began entering the newly established branches of the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers (NHDVS), many found that their voting rights were called into question.
Featured Stories
VA Central Office Building: A Legacy of Service to Veterans Since 1918
The Arlington Building, known today as the VA Central Office (VACO) Building, has been the central location for management of services to Veterans for over 100 years. While VA and its immediate predecessors have been the sole occupants of 810 Vermont Avenue since the building opened in the fall of 1918, the intended purpose of the completed building would change several times. The story of today’s VACO includes the origins of a new Nation and its capital, the demolition of a well-known landmark, bankruptcy, war, and a backstory of land ownership tied to one of the capital’s most prominent families.




