This is Part 4 of a 6-part short history of the Office of Construction and Facilities Management. This short history is also the first in a series of histories covering VA Central Office directorates. Make sure to check out Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 as well.

In September 1953, Administrator Harvey V. Higley reorganized the VA Central Office (VACO) based on a proposal authored by previous Administrator Carl R. Gray, Jr.[1] As part of these changes, the Office of Construction, Supply, and Real Estate was renamed the Office of Construction. Though the Office of Construction remained within VACO, the supply and hospital management tasks of the office were moved to the newly-created Department of Medicine and Surgery.[2] One of the major goals of the reorganization effort was to shift more authority from VACO to VA’s regional offices and individual facilities.[3] The Office of Construction instituted policies that reflected this goal, such as increasing local control over construction projects.[4] The number of architects and engineers typically assigned to projects was also reduced as part of these policy changes, though that decision was possibly influenced by the office’s decreasing number of staff during this period. This was caused in part by increasing competition from private firms in hiring these positions.[5] By 1956, the number of office staff had decreased by half since a high of approximately 1,000 in the late 1940s.[6] With fewer architects and engineers on staff, the Office of Construction was forced to rely on private contractors to design facilities and aid in construction oversight through the 1950s.[7]

VA’s construction process brochure
As the Office of Construction relied more heavily on private architects and engineers in the construction of new VA facilities, the office developed brochures that described VA’s construction processes. These two examples date from 1976 (top) and 1982 (bottom). (Veterans Administration)
As the Office of Construction relied more heavily on private architects and engineers in the construction of new VA facilities, the office developed brochures that described VA’s construction processes. These two examples date from 1976 (top) and 1982 (bottom). (Veterans Administration)

Following the completion of the post-WWII hospital construction program, the Office of Construction turned its focus to VA’s pre-WWII facilities. In 1959, the office completed a study of the modernization needs of these hospitals, which constituted 53 percent of VA’s bed capacity. Using the study’s findings, they created a 12-year plan to address the aging facilities’ deficiencies through updates or replacements.[8] Work for the modernization plan began in 1961.[9] Other programs were established in the 1960s as well, including a training program for recently graduated architects and engineers, a nursing home program to construct long-term care facilities for the aging Veteran population, and a medical research facilities development program to create more space for innovation.[10] Beyond general construction, the office continued to serve as the home of two other programs. The Real Estate program oversaw the acquisition and disposal of VA property, while the Safety and Fire Protection program continued its mission of advocating for caution against injury and fire in VA’s facilities. Through this period, the office continued to rely on both their staff and contracted, private architects and engineers for all stages of projects, including design, oversight, and final approval.[11]

In the 1970s, the construction and facilities management responsibilities within VA continued to expand, with both the Office of Construction and the Department of Medicine and Surgery establishing new programs aimed at building and maintaining facilities. These programs focused on such issues as construction research to investigate efficient building methods and designs; environmental and cultural preservation; energy efficiency; facility security; handicap accessible designs; and earthquake engineering to develop structurally safe designs for buildings, equipment, and furniture.[12] The latter of these efforts was developed in response to the 1971 earthquake in San Fernando, California, that destroyed the VA hospital there.

The image on the left shows a rescue team searching for people trapped under a section of the VA hospital that was demolished by the 1971 San Fernando, California earthquake. The event alerted VA leadership to the seismic vulnerabilities at many other VA facilities, particularly in the western United States. The Office of Construction quickly developed new building standards to protect against the threat of earthquakes, which included guidance on seismically safe furniture, equipment, and supplies within its facilities. The image on the right is the cover of the first study on this topic. (left: Bruce Cox/Los Angeles Times; right: Veterans Administration) [right image sourced from Google Books]
The image on the left shows a rescue team searching for people trapped under a section of the VA hospital that was demolished by the 1971 San Fernando, California earthquake. The event alerted VA leadership to the seismic vulnerabilities at many other VA facilities, particularly in the western United States. The Office of Construction quickly developed new building standards to protect against the threat of earthquakes, which included guidance on seismically safe furniture, equipment, and supplies within its facilities. The image on the right is the cover of the first study on this topic. (left: Bruce Cox/Los Angeles Times; right: Veterans Administration) [right image sourced from Google Books]

As the Office of Construction completed its pre-WWII hospital modernization efforts in 1973, Congress passed the National Cemeteries Act, placing most national cemeteries, previously managed by the U.S. Army, under the control of VA.[13] With the transfer, the Office of Construction assumed the responsibility for designing and constructing cemetery facilities, though the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finalized all projects that were already in progress at the time of the transition.[14] One of the first major cemetery construction projects the office oversaw was at Riverside National Cemetery in California, which was built between 1976 and 1978.[15]

Similar to its work in other areas of facility construction and repair at VA, the Office of Construction developed standards and completed studies for cemeteries. This study, published in 1980, investigated current and potential future interment methods. (Veterans Administration) [sourced from HathiTrust]
Similar to its work in other areas of facility construction and repair at VA, the Office of Construction developed standards and completed studies for cemeteries. This study, published in 1980, investigated current and potential future interment methods. (Veterans Administration) [sourced from HathiTrust]

The three-decade span between 1950 and 1980 was a time of both expansion and reduction for the Office of Construction as it gained several new responsibilities from facility safety to cemetery construction, but the office also saw a decrease in its staff. In one respect, this was an era of consistency as well, as its name, the Office of Construction, remained the same from 1953 to the mid-1980s.

Part 5, Late Twentieth Century Changes: Finding a Home for VA’s Construction and Facilities Activities will be posted in September.

[1] “VA Reorganization Plans Reach Hinds,” The Clarion-Ledger (Jackson, Mississippi), July 8, 1953.

[2] Carl R. Gray, Jr., Reorganization of Veterans Administration: Background and Solution (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Veterans Administration, 1953), 46-47.

[3] “Reorganization of the Veterans Administration is Reaching Final Stages,” The Geraldine Review (Geraldine, Montana), October 7, 1953.

[4] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1954 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1955),153; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1955, 150; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1956 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1957),165.

[5] Ibid.

[6] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1956, 165.

[7] Ibid.; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1957 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1957),119-120; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1958 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959),105.

[8] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1959 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1960),107.

[9] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1961 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1962),126.

[10] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1961, 134; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1964 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964),118; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1965 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965),120; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1968 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968),163.

[11] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1959, 107-108; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1960 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961),109; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1967 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967),143.

[12] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, 1970 Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971), 23; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, 1971 Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972), 34; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report 1972 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973), 44-47; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Administrator of Veterans Affairs Annual Report ’73 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974), 57-58; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report 1974, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975), 58-60; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report ’75, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976), 57-58; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, 1976 Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977), 54-59; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report 1978, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979), 94.

[13] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Administrator of Veterans Affairs Annual Report ’73, 7.

[14] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report ’75, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 98; “History of CFM,” Office of Construction and Facilities Management.

[15] U.S. Veterans’ Administration, 1976 Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 58; U.S. Veterans’ Administration, Annual Report, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, 1977 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978), 90.

Share this story

By Wes Nimmo

Related Stories

  • Read VA Social Worker Anna B. Raines, Pioneer of the Veterans Foster Care Program

    Featured Stories

    VA Social Worker Anna B. Raines, Pioneer of the Veterans Foster Care Program

    Anna B. Raines was frustrated. As the lone psychiatric social worker between 1924 and 1944 at the Veterans Hospital in Tuskegee, Alabama, Raines operated without a proper office, resources, or staff while serving a population of some 600 patients. Raines was also responsible for Veterans in the 22 counties surrounding Tuskegee. Raines took her profession seriously and was often disheartened by what she perceived as administration’s indifference to her position. Raines’ personal papers convey a tale of struggle and document the numerous limits she faced as an early VA social worker. [1]   She nevertheless persevered and developed a prototype of a home-based foster care system for Veterans long before similar programs were implemented nationally.

  • Read Issue in Doubt: Veteran Voting Rights in Post-Civil War National Homes

    Featured Stories

    Issue in Doubt: Veteran Voting Rights in Post-Civil War National Homes

    In the post-Civil War era, ensuring that former members of our Nation’s military had the opportunity to vote was not always a straightforward task. During the Civil War, many states had loosened voting restrictions and allowed soldiers to vote while away fighting. Commanders allowed sufficient time during marches for their troops to cast a ballot, which many mailed home in cracker or cigar boxes.[1] Yet when the Civil War ended and Veterans began entering the newly established branches of the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers (NHDVS), many found that their voting rights were called into question.

  • Read VA Central Office Building: A Legacy of Service to Veterans Since 1918

    Featured Stories

    VA Central Office Building: A Legacy of Service to Veterans Since 1918

    The Arlington Building, known today as the VA Central Office (VACO) Building, has been the central location for management of services to Veterans for over 100 years. While VA and its immediate predecessors have been the sole occupants of 810 Vermont Avenue since the building opened in the fall of 1918, the intended purpose of the completed building would change several times. The story of today’s VACO includes the origins of a new Nation and its capital, the demolition of a well-known landmark, bankruptcy, war, and a backstory of land ownership tied to one of the capital’s most prominent families.