Object 61: Edmund Whitman’s 1869 Report on Reburying Union Dead in National Cemeteries

The U.S. Army’s plan for the recovery of Union dead across the battle-ravaged South after the Civil War came about through the labors of a remarkable if little known officer, Edmund B. Whitman. He spent four years overseeing the collection of thousands of remains and creating “mortuary records” of reburials in new national cemeteries. After completing his “Harvest of Death,” to use his phrase, he produced in 1869 an extraordinary report that recounted the breadth, sequence, and challenges of his reinternment mission.

The mortuary statistics contained within the report’s 130-plus pages are important, but the illustrations are no less valuable. The artwork includes sketches and plats of twenty national cemeteries, as well as individual “cemeterial district” maps showing where the dead were found and subsequently reburied. Whitman had some experience doing this kind of work. The Harvard College graduate was an educator in the East until 1855, when he moved to Kansas Territory as a representative of the New England Emigrant Aid Society. In the late 1850s, he partnered with Albert D. Searl to survey and map farms, railroads, and make “town plats, and historical views of scenes.”

Whitman was 49 when he enlisted in the Union Army in July 1862. Appointed a captain and assistant quartermaster, he spent the war years in Tennessee and its environs. In December 1865, Major General George H. Thomas tasked Whitman with “visiting battle-fields, cemeteries, and places where Union dead are interred” throughout the Department of the Cumberland, which encompassed Tennessee and Kentucky, as well as parts of Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi.

He set out on his first expedition through this territory on March 1, 1866, accompanied by officers, soldiers, and clerks. Promoted to brevet major in June 1866, Whitman was given the additional responsibility of “locating, purchasing, and establishing National Cemeteries, and preparing Mortuary Records.” The disinterment of remains began in October. In January 1867, Whitman was named Superintendent of National Cemeteries. Although his appointment applied only to the Department of the Cumberland, the system he developed was adopted nationally.

Whitman identified four “principles which should govern in the selection of national cemetery sites”: 1) “Distinguished localities, of great historical interest” to honor the Union’s sacrifice; 2) “points conspicuous . . . on the great thorough-fares of the nation”; 3) “central points, convenient of access”; and 4) “favorable conditions for ornamentation, so that surviving comrades, loving friends, and grateful States, might be encouraged to expend liberally of their means, for such purposes.”

These criteria were reflected in the “cemeterial districts” Whitman delineated after three major expeditions and several shorter trips in search of the dead. Charles F. Smith drafted individual maps of the two dozen or so districts; these were published separately from the final report. Diminutive, delicate, and inked in black with pink, green and other pastel watercolors, they show geographic features and, in red ink, a flag at the cemetery. Their cheery appearance belies the human loss they illustrate.  

In the report proper, technical “surveys [and] elaborate sectional plats” were paired with charming and imaginative cemetery views from the perspective of approaching pedestrians. Philip M. Radford, a Nashville-based civil engineer, produced the eighteen sketches. Since photographs of national cemetery landscapes in the late 1860s are scarce, Radford’s work offers a rare view of the early construction in the cemeteries, wooden structures such as lodges, a “head board house,” and a “pump” (well) shelter.

Collectively, the plats are notable for illustrating one-quarter of all the national cemeteries established by 1872 when reburials were complete. The Army did not produce a national cemetery atlas until 1892-1893. Individually, the plats show the range of designed landscapes and how the dead were buried in sections, by state, enlisted and officer, Black and White. No federal policy about posthumous segregation has been found for this era, but Whitman was clear that he would not tolerate the practice.

“No distinction is to be made in regard to color so far as the removal to the National Cemeteries is concerned,” he wrote in 1867. “[Black troops] are in every way, to be treated as if they were white soldiers.” The war created more unknown dead than any U.S. conflict. Remains that could not be identified were buried together. Whitman observed that this was the most sorrowful outcome for the government, the men who sacrificed their lives, and their loved ones.   

Whitman quantified the results of his work. His men visited nearly 2,000 localities, found in excess of 40,000 scattered graves, and recorded more than 10,000 names. They collected remains from “no less than 6,283 distinct spots” and reinterred more than 114,500 remains into national cemeteries within the Military Division of the Tennessee. He mustered out of the Army on July 15, 1868, at the rank of brevet lieutenant colonel, but he spent another year as a civilian producing this report, which “formed the basis of the elaborate system of National Cemeteries.”

His efforts led to passage of the 1867 National Cemetery Act, the first substantive legislation to define these shrines and provide permanent grave markers to honor service members. Whitman’s accomplishment, handsomely illustrated in this report, was echoed in a Society of the Army of the Cumberland eulogy: “The beautiful cemeteries of the Southern States will remain a perpetual memorial of Colonel Whitman.”

This report and individual district maps are part of the U.S. Army Quartermaster records (RG 92) at the National Archives facilities in Washington D.C., and College Park, Maryland, respectively.